gurdymonkey: (Default)
gurdymonkey ([personal profile] gurdymonkey) wrote2007-03-29 07:05 pm

What does not kill me makes me stronger

To borrow and misquote the immortal Crash Davis in "Bull Durham," SCA arts competitions, like strike-outs, are "boring. Besides that, they're fascist."

See, I never saw the point of going to all the trouble to make myself something I need, only to deprive myself of its use so it could sit on a table for people to ooh and ahh over it. You wanna ooh and ahh over it, do that while I'm wearing it or using it. You want to talk to me about it, TALK to me about it. Be brave enough to make comments to my face, don't hide behind a piece of paper and a bunch of meaningless numbers. Have enough respect for me to treat me as an adult.

However, when I began my SCA performance career, it was in a kingdom that didn't camp much. I had nowhere else to give it a shot so I did it at a royal bardic championship. The full bore shakes and adrenalin meltdown were so spectactular that total strangers came up to me for the rest of the event to see if I was ok. The only reason I kept beating my head on this particular brick wall was that (a) people were supportive, (b) it was the only way to fight the fear and (c) it was the only game in town.

So I did my homework. I did danceband duty and "recorder-and" sessions with Jannequinne and listened to all the early music recordings I could get my hands on and memorized songs and beat my head on the brick wall in front of audiences. My second time out of the barn I had to follow a friend who was a much more experienced performer and who had the audience laughing with a filk about fighter chicks. I chickened. I dumped the period Robin Hood ballad and gave them Patsy Cline. They laughed in all the right places. They applauded. People asked for the lyrics. I still had the shakes and wasn't proud of my material. It was too easy. I felt like a liar. I had cheated and been allowed to get away with it - and I still sucked.

The years went by. I got better, but still shook. I tried to find tricks to make things less scary. And I noticed what got rewarded. Sometimes the pseudoCeltoidfilkmonkeys beat the truly inspiring poet. Sometimes a pretty dress meant more than what was coming out of the wearer's mouth. I thought it was lame and unfair and wrong.

Then one fine day at a local arts event I was begged, do you hear me, BEGGED to enter the bardic competition because, you see, we only have one entrant and we can't run it unless there are at least two. The other entrant was a newbie so green she hid behind her copy and quavered her two pieces into her page in a barely audible monotone. I clubbed her to the ground like the harp seal she was merely because I sucked less. Oh, look, another accomplishment not to be proud of, despite some very kind commentary by the judges.

You know something? It's OK not to compete. It's OK for my audience not to like my performance or my material. After all, Eminem is not crying in a corner because I don't like rap. This epiphany freed my mind, Neo, no blue pill necessary. (Or was it a red pill?) My confidence grew exponentially as a result.

No more merciless scribbling going on where I can see or hear it while I'm trying to concentrate and when they should be listening and having a perfectly normal subjective response to my performance.

No more numbers trying to quantify the unquantifiable.

No more riding the adrenalin roller coaster with white knuckles because of the voices in my head telling me every breath matters.

No more feeling frustrated or hurt because somebody likes something else better.

Making peace with the ephemeral nature of something that once done is gone and cannot be taken back.

No more believing the lies about objective judging. Response to art is subjective, dammit. Have the guts to admit it.

"Hey y'all, watch THIS!"

You ROCK!

[identity profile] kass-rants.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
As you know, there was a time when I gave a damn about competitions. I thought competitions would get me noticed. On a secondary level, I thought competing would get me good feedback from people more accomplished than me. Nope. As far as I can tell, it did neither.

Competitions are not fair. None of them. As you so brilliantly put it, "Response to art is subjective." Someone whose documentation is the back of his celtic music CD should never win over someone singing a 15th century German piece even if he stared at his music the whole time.

When I went to an SCA after about four years of avoiding them like the plague, I wore my drawnwork jacket (you know the one). People said, "Oh! You should put that in the A&S display!" Suddenly I started channeling you! I said, "It is on display... right here on my back. What do you want to know about it?"

The truth is you can't experience an item laying on a table the same way you can experience it in use. And I suspect performance has an analog -- a performer playing to an audience for enjoyment is a different thing than a performer playing to judges. Or at least I'd expect so since the most performing I do is this comedy routine I call "thinking out loud".
mermaidlady: heraldic mermaid in her vanity (Default)

[personal profile] mermaidlady 2007-03-30 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Any post that starts out with a quote from Bull Durham gets my attention. : )

I wish I had more time to write about why I don't like A&S competitions and some of my issues with performance competitions. I'll just say for now that I agree with many of your points.

[identity profile] acanthusleaf.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
My dislike of competitions led me (while I ws Scribe of the Mists) to start doing scribal displays at events, some mumblety-ump years ago in the West. We bought plastic sheets to protect the scrolls at outdoor events and just had stuff out to look at. If the artist wanted feedback, he/she could get it, or if they were shy they didn't have to stick around. This got a lot of good exposure and feedback for a lot of up-and-coming scribes back then.

That said, a lot of the problems most artists have stem from identifying themselves with their work. A judge in a competition (who may be a PhD in that subject or may have been begged into judging something they only know peripherally) is looking at an *object* or a specific *performance*. They are not judging *you*. You are not a scroll, or a song. Your entire life's worth cannot be summed up in one performance or in one object.

I know you read some other journals that referred to the specific bout of insanity that is the biannual Arts Pentathlon in Caid. This is one instance where the object or performance is being compared to a historic ideal (as much as the human beings available to judge the entries can make it). We try to make it clear that it is not the place to go for mindless back-patting. It is an enormous effort to put the thing on and frankly, to enter it as well, so it's held every other year. The judging coordinator scours the kingdom for the most knowledgeable peoplpe who are both available that weekend and not entering the competition. The judges *agonize* over what they write on feedback forms - they want to guide the entrants toward improvement without crushing their egos. The good is that we can see some of the most *amazing* stuff, stuff that might not ever be produced otherwise. It can also be an opportunity to melt down from stress, especially when you put too much self-identification into your art.

Let's try to take it easy on the well-meaning people who encourage everybody to enter arts competitions. They are trying to encourage your art. They mean it as a compliment. We can graciously demurr without being all bitter about past injustices done to us by ignorant judges and how we lost to the unworthy. It's not about us; it's about the art.

[identity profile] gurdymonkey.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
For the record, I have never "lost to the unworthy." I was commenting on what I observed, not what happened to me.

My original post is my survival guide, my way of making peace with a situation that otherwise would make me even more rabidly nuts than I already am, and yes, reducing the terror of getting up in front of an audience.

Some people like the framework of competition in the SCA. I don't. For me, the nuts-making factors outweigh any advantages.

Besides, nobody should have to weep over a hobby.

Performance Anxiety and competition

[identity profile] czina.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
Many of the points you list are reasons why I haven't performed in front of an audience (or a judge/play director) since college. I have terrible stage fright, but like the idea of performing. However, I also know I'm not as good as others in this respect. I have the 'theory' down (after all, a BFA in Theatre Arts is good for things like that) - but I don't have the talent.

So I don't perform, although I was thinking about it for this Pentathlon. I have an advantage over some, I think - I *LIKE* doing the research and writing a mini-paper documenting things. So choosing something period and documenting it, the time period, the garb, etc. - that's the easy part for me. I can also memorize things without too much trouble. But standing in front of an audience and performing? Not so good. And I applaud everyone who DOES stand up and perform, knowing how difficult it can be, for some.

Do what you're comfortable doing - be it performing, competing, listening, or covering your ears (although removing yourself from the offending noise is more polite). It's all a hobby, and life's too short to get upset over things that should make you happy.

Heh - and who knows? Maybe by the next Pentathlon (or other arts event in my vicinity) - I'll have worked up the courage to perform that monologue from Elizabeth I, in full Elizabethan/Tudor garb. Heh - I have the research done, already :)

Re: Performance Anxiety and competition

[identity profile] gurdymonkey.livejournal.com 2007-04-03 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
If you have issues with stage fright, jumping into the deep end of the pool (i.e., taking a shot at something like Pentathlon) may not be the best place to get started. Yes, I did it - because there were no other venues.

I'm just starting to get back in the pool after being broken. No problem with dance band duty or street busking, but singing in front of people is still iffy. My audience the other night was four people who know me and get what I do - I could handle that.

Starting small and finding your comfort level is not a bad way to go.